<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[JForum Community - Latest posts for "udittmer"]]></title>
		<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/listByUser/40</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Latest posts for "udittmer"]]></description>
		<generator>JForum - http://www.jforum.net</generator>
			<item>
				<title>[User Forum] Jakarta EE 9</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ A first version of a Jakarta EE version is available; see <a class="snap_shots" href="https://community.jforum.net/posts/list/298.page" target="_blank">https://community.jforum.net/posts/list/298.page</a>.
<br>
<br>
Not yet as a war, but in source form only.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/296/1287</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/296/1287</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 17 May 2025 20:06:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>[Announcements] First beta of JakartaEE 10 version is available</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ A <a class="snap_shots" href="https://sourceforge.net/p/jforum2/code/HEAD/tree/branches/jakarta/" target="_blank">source code branch</a> and a <a class="snap_shots" href="https://sourceforge.net/projects/jforum2/files/" target="_blank">beta build</a> are available for running JForum in JakartaEE 10 environments such as Tomcat 10.1. The minimum Java version required is Java 11. This has not been tested as extensively as previous versions, and remains work in progress. But it contains no known bugs, even quite a few bugs less than the last release version 2.8.3.
<br>
<br>
Please send us feedback if you use it, both positive and negative.
<br>]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/298/1286</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/298/1286</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 17 May 2025 20:04:04]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>[User Forum] Re:Missing &#39;Secure&#39; flag in &#39;Set-Cookie&#39; header in HTTP response.</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ The settings in web.xml are only for the session cookie, not for any other cookies that may get set by the web app (see <tt>ControllerUtils.addCookie</tt>). The problem with always setting the <tt>secure</tt> flag is that it won't work for HTTP-only installations (which sometimes exist in non-public installations). So the thing to do is to make that dependent on the base URL. For the next release I'll add this:
<br>
<br>
<pre class="line-numbers"><code class="language-java match-braces"><br>cookie.setHttpOnly(true);<br>if (SystemGlobals.getValue(ConfigKeys.FORUM_LINK).startsWith("https"))<br>	cookie.setSecure(true);<br></code></pre>
<br>
<br>
but unless you want to recompile the source yourself, there is no external configuration you can apply to make this happen.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/297/1283</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/297/1283</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 12 Mar 2025 17:19:42]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>[User Forum] Re:Jakarta EE 9</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited">
 <div>But I don't understand why you don't upgrade JForum? How will you manage security vulnerabilities in Java EE 8 when it's not supported anymore?</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
We certainly will at some point. It's mostly a matter of time and priorities. TC 9 will likely be supported for a few more years, and currently JForum runs fine on TC 10 with the <i>webapps-javaee</i> mechanism, AFAIK. So there is no pressing need. Your use case is a bit of an outlier in that respect. This doesn't mean it'll be years before a JakartaEE version comes out, though. Just that we have nothing to announce right now.
<br>
<br>
But we also need to consider hosting, which in places is restricted to Java 8, meaning TC 9 (for example, on this very host). That would need to be updated in order to run the latest JForum, which we would want to do - we wouldn't want to maintain builds for different API levels.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="uncited">
 <div>there is a public Apache release available with support for Servlet 6 (which uses Jakarta EE).</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
We're aware of that, as I had mentioned above. That was just an example.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/296/1281</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/296/1281</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 17 Jan 2025 00:33:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>[User Forum] Jakarta EE 9</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It is not as simple as that. JForum has various dependencies, some of which are also based on javax packages rather than jakarta ones. (Commons FileUpload comes to mind right away, although that one does have a Jakarta version.)
<br>
<br>
But it's not clear that a new version is needed. <a class="snap_shots" href="https://community.jforum.net/posts/list/257.page" target="_blank">Some time ago</a>, JForum ran fine in Tomcat's <i>webapps-javaee</i> folder; have you tried that?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/296/1279</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/296/1279</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 16 Jan 2025 20:39:48]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>[User Forum] Banned from forum</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I don't think banning is ever an automatic action. It's always manual through Admin Panel -&gt; Banning. Maybe you played around with that, and did it inadvertently?
<br>
<br>
We're glad to help, as JForum is a pet project of ours <img src="https://community.jforum.net/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" alt="smilie">]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/295/1277</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/295/1277</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 9 Jan 2025 21:38:00]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>[User Forum] Banned from forum</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If you have access to the DB, check the jforum_banlist table. There are various ban types: by user ID, by email and by IP. Check if anything in there matches your case. (The anonymous user, which is used for non-logged-in sessions, has ID 1.)]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/295/1275</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/295/1275</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 9 Jan 2025 21:16:07]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>[Developer Forum] Email Integration Tests</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If the test fail, there should be exception stack messages in the output - post those here in full. Without those, it's hard to tell what's going wrong.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/294/1269</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/294/1269</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 8 Dec 2024 20:59:59]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>[Developer Forum] search problem</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ This kind of issue is hard to track down without having access to the forum in question. Can you reproduce it on this site?
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="uncited">
 <div>So the problem is i have 159 results. First page is good, but when i try to pass any other page i have no results.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
You mean clicking the pagination buttons?
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="uncited">
 <div>Experimentally i found that problem in the number of search keywords.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
What specifically did you test, and what, exactly, was the result?
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="uncited">
 <div>Should i use any other delimiter instead of spaces or it's a bug?</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Spaces are correct.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/293/1267</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/293/1267</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 5 Dec 2024 16:11:47]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>[User Forum] User tells me they are banned, and I have no idea why...</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote class="uncited">
 <div>They also noted that their ISP occasionally reassigns IP addresses, so it's possibly they just got one with an abuse history.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
IP reassignment is common for both DSL and cable. Although users usually keep their IPs for weeks or months at a time these days, at some point it does get changed.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/292/1263</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/292/1263</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 15 Jul 2024 02:38:45]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>[User Forum] User tells me they are banned, and I have no idea why...</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ It's also possible to ban by user ID, so be sure to check for that as well. But it seems unlikely to be the problem here, if they're not banned by email.
<br>
<br>
As an admin you can see the IP address of where people posted from - maybe check a few of the IP addresses that user posted from, to see if one or more of those are listed in the Banning list.
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="uncited">
 <div>If I go to the "users" section and try to look up their account, I can't find it.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
That is really odd. Note that you can search the user list by email, so you should find it that way. Or maybe the user misremembered under which email address they registered?]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/292/1261</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/292/1261</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Sun, 14 Jul 2024 17:58:26]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>[User Forum] Trying to understand JForum</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ I'm not aware of a war archive of the original JForum (the versions that came before 2.2). You can find the final source code of version 2.1.8 by the original maintainer (Rafael Steil) at <a class="snap_shots" href="https://github.com/rafaelsteil/jforum2" target="_blank">https://github.com/rafaelsteil/jforum2</a>. From that, you can build the war.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/290/1257</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/290/1257</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 4 Apr 2024 00:03:03]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>[User Forum] Trying to understand JForum</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ We've upped the container and Java requirements at various points in time as older versions became obsolete, but we haven't documented which JForum version required what.
<br>
<br>
But all your software is so old that it doesn't matter much - compared to upgrading from Windows Server 2003, upgrading Java and TC should be a piece of cake <img src="https://community.jforum.net/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" alt="smilie"> (And as discussed above, TC 5.5 will not do - TC 8 is the minimum, and there is no good reason not to use TC 9.)
<br>
<br>
As to upgrading JForum, check out <a class="snap_shots" href="https://community.jforum.net/posts/list/285.page" target="_blank">https://community.jforum.net/posts/list/285.page</a> for the experience of someone going from 2.1 to the current version]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/290/1255</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/290/1255</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Mar 2024 21:38:51]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>[User Forum] Trying to understand JForum</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ If you're an admin of the JForum installation, check the Admin Control Panel. If it is set to check for new versions, it will tell you which one you have, and which one is the latest.
<br>
<br>
Alternatively, check the installed files - <tt>WEB-INF/config/SystemGlobals.properties</tt> has the version at the very end of the file.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/290/1252</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/290/1252</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:34:20]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
			<item>
				<title>[User Forum] Trying to understand JForum</title>
				<description><![CDATA[ Hi- I think you looked at the wrong column on that page. What it tells you is that any Tomcat version 8.0 or newer supports Servlets 3.1. I would advise to use 9.x or 10.1.x.
<br>
<br>
As to the Java version, JForum requires <i>at least</i> Java 8, and it runs fine under Java 11.
<br>
<br>
Be aware that starting with version 10, Tomcat implements JakarteEE servlets, not Javax servlets, so you will have to run JForum (which uses Javax servlets) in the <i>webapps-jakartaee</i> folder, as described in <a class="snap_shots" href="https://tomcat.apache.org/migration-10.html#Specification_APIs" target="_blank">https://tomcat.apache.org/migration-10.html#Specification_APIs</a>. if you want to avoid that, just use Tomcat 9.]]></description>
				<guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/290/1250</guid>
				<link>https://community.jforum.net/posts/preList/290/1250</link>
				<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 12 Mar 2024 19:07:14]]> GMT</pubDate>
				<author><![CDATA[ udittmer]]></author>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>